Review: David Ziser’s Digital Wakeup Call Tour
05 17 2009This past week I attended David Ziser’s “Digital Wakeup Call Tour: A New Dawn” photography seminar. The description sounded promising — for $59, get four hours of tips and tricks from one of the top wedding photographers in three broad areas — photography, software post-production, and building your business. I attended expecting lots of useful information.
So, you may ask, how was it? Overall, it was excellent, and I was very happy I went.
During the photography section, Mr. Ziser rapidly went over a flurry of tips on how to take high-quality, distinctive event photos. A few of the tips, like always taking indoor flash photos in M[anual] mode, I’d stumbled onto myself after lots of trial and error. Most, though, like manually zooming your flash when taking wide angle shots, were completely new to me, and will be very helpful the next time I’m in those situations. Mr. Ziser has a very different style from mine, and his photos are aimed for a different audience, one that prefers large prints over Facebook, so some of the tips didn’t apply. However, overall, I learned a lot, and I think the info from this section will do a lot to improve my photography.
The software section was where the tour sponsors became painfully evident. Given the relatively low admission price for such a high-quality seminar, it shouldn’t be surprising that most of the tour’s expenses were being paid for by corporate sponsors, and that those sponsors were promised advertising in exchange for their support. Mr. Ziser did seem genuinely enthusiastic about the products he talked about, and they all seemed helpful for most event photographers. They appeared to be less useful for me personally, for two reasons.
First, my style of cosplay photography is very high-volume — historically I’ve done more con coverage than selective photoshoots. That, coupled with the fact that cosplay photography pays, on average, $0/photo, means that I can’t spend that much time on each photo. In general, I try to spend no more than one minute editing each photo, including cropping, color, exposure, and contrast. Even with that goal, if I post 2000 photos from a convention, that’s 2000 minutes (or about 33 hours) of photo editing. If I tried some of the techniques described in the software section, it would take me six months to post all the photos. Though as I do more private photoshoots, I’ll probably start posting fewer photos, and have more time to edit each one.
Second, I do almost all of my photo editing today in Canon’s Digital Photo Professional (DPP) software. (The one major exception is noise reduction, where I use Noise Ninja.) DPP fits into my existing workflow very well, and I have no good reason right now to make changes. In the future I may move to Lightroom, but I haven’t felt I need its complexity or power quite yet.
After the software section, the seminar concluded with a section on growing a small service business. While the examples were, of course, all photography-oriented, they could easily be adapted for any small business. The most important tip, to me, was one that I still struggle with — Don’t undervalue your work. As a small business its easy to convince yourself you have to compete on price, that your business has to have the lowest prices, and has to win over every potential customer. A better approach is to charge a sustainable price, ignore unprofitable customers, and accept that you won’t be the best fit for everyone.
While in general the business tips were excellent, the technology-related tips did seem a bit behind the curve. Blogs were mentioned, but some other leading-edge techniques were ignored, including the importance of a good corporate web site and building awareness of your business on social networking sites.
I wasn’t very surprised by these omissions, because in general there was a very obvious gap between Mr. Ziser and today’s younger generation. Mr. Ziser has been very quick in adopting new photography technologies, including digital photography, the latest high-ISO techniques, IS/OS/VC lenses, and dSLRs with video recording. However, he doesn’t seem to have adapted as well to changes in how people view photography and paper prints.
For example, Mr. Ziser still believes looking through a physical wedding photo album is a better experience and is more romantic than looking at the same photos together on a computer screen, and he’s right, for most people down to the age of about 25-30. Younger than that, though, I believe the mystique of a physical wedding album is much less, and in many cases will never be preferred over looking at the same photos on the computer together. In my experience people below the age of 25 very rarely want prints, regardless of the occasion, even when they cost $0.19 each; if you ask them to pay $10 or $50 a print they’re going to look at you like you’re trying to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge. And, no, I don’t believe they all will regret the lack of a physical album in the future.
Mr. Ziser was also a bit behind the curve on data archiving. 45GB of data still seems like a huge amount to him. With today’s 1.5TB drives around $120/each, it’s a trival amount to store. Except, of course, when you’re trying to burn the data onto DVDs. Wait, why DVDs? Well, apparently, Mr. Ziser believes that DVDs are better for data archiving because they have been certified to last 100 years. Putting aside the obvious question of how media can be certified to last 100 years without a time machine, will it even be possible to find a DVD reader in a 100 years? (Consider 5.25″ floppies, and how hard it is to read one of them less than 20 years after they were the #1 storage medium.) A better solution is to archive data to the largest available storage device today (1.5TB drives), and then recopy the data every few years to a newer, higher-capacity solution. For example, I originally archived my photos to 700MB CDROMs. When DVD burners came along, I consolidated my CDROM archives into a few DVDs, which were later consolidated onto 250GB hard drives, which recently were consolidated onto one big 1.5TB drive. Because digital media changes so fast, archives have to be constantly moved to newer media, so as long as your archival medium lasts 3-4 years, you’re set.
Mr. Ziser also all but admitted he doesn’t really understand social networking sites like Facebook. In general, his customers appear to be on the older and fairly-well-off side. That’s certainly an enviable position to be in, but one that limits how much exposure he has to today’s younger, middle-class photography customer. Because of differences in how a screen and a printer render a photo, a lot of his photos don’t look that great until you see them on paper, preferably 10×14 or larger (or on metallic paper). This is perfect for his client base, but is less desirable to other customer demographics who want photos that also look great on Facebook.
I felt the seminar was well worth $59 and four hours of my time, despite the sometimes heavy-handed sponsorship messages. I came away with lots of mental notes on things to try the next time I’m in the field, and am very happy I attended. I recommend this seminar for all event photographers who wish to improve their craft and their business.




Interesting post, Oscar. So I know that part of photographing cosplay and cons is that it’s fun for you. But do you ever foresee being able to turn it into a profitable business? Do you hand out business cards with links to your website? I wonder if you charged a nominal fee for downloadable originals (leaving low-res Facebook-quality photos unwatermarked) whether people would even bother to pay you.
I recently heard of a photographer who shot at a high school event and offered original downloads for free. He actually got several inquiries asking if it was really ok for them to download them and use them on Facebook. I suppose the amazing implication being that somebody under 25 realized that photos do have some monetary value and that perhaps they would be willing to pay for them. I guess the question is what’s the right price-point? $0.99? $1.99? I mean, assuming you’ve got a Pro account with SmugMug (just go ahead and start on that Tivo app, they’ll float you a freebie) it wouldn’t cost you anything to start charging for them.)
Maybe you could do it as an experiment.
Cause I’m just saying — 33 hours is a lot of time. And yeah, you should *really* look into Lightroom. Advanced features aside, I think you’re discounting how much faster your workflow could be with some of their tools.
The DVDs that last a hundred years are the pressed ones. Burn-em-yourself DVD-Rs are much shorter-lived.
As for photography — I haven’t used the WIndows version of DPP, but Aperture is a much, much more efficient way of processing through a big pile of photos than the mac DPP.
Darryl, thank you for the suggestions. I already have a Pro Smugmug account, and do charge a nominal ($0.50) fee for downloading originals. (Low-res watermarked photos can be downloaded for free with a little effort.) I also do charge for prints above Smugmug’s base pricing. I also give out business cards with a link to the photos at conventions. At most a half-dozen cosplayers per convention have ever paid for downloading originals or for prints.
I do get asked by cosplayers if it’s ok for them to download & repost my (low-res, watermarked) photos, but in my experience that means they respect the photographer and photo ownership, not that they are willing and able to pay for photos.
Yeah, 33 hours is a lot of time, and that doesn’t include the initial sorting either. But it’s certainly not an unsually time-intensive hobby — cosplayers frequently spent much more than that on just one costume. Also, I already have a job and a side business; I really don’t want or need a second side business.
I probably will end up looking at Lightroom at some point. Part of the issue is that my current desktop system is a bit dated, and would need to be replaced before LR would run at a reasonable speed. (I may need to do this soon anyways because it’s struggling with 5DII 21MP RAWs even in DPP.) Another is that Caroline and I have our combined editing process very well tuned, and neither of us have the energy right now to learn a new, fairly complicated piece of software. Finally, in my (limited) experience with LR, I prefer DPP’s default RAW processing over LR. I’m sure LR can be tuned to some extent, but the last time I used ACR I was not very happy with the results.
Mr. Ziser said he was using burn-em-yourself DVD-Rs that are certified to last 100 years. I’m very sceptical of the DVD-R manufacturer’s claims.
So far, DPP has worked very well for convention photos. Aperture isn’t really an option for us, and I have concerns about LR as I noted in my response to Darryl.
Im not sure if you heard or not, but Adobe is Giving away lightroom3 beta version to try for the next few months. You could give it a try. Thank you for posting something on the Wake up call, I was curious to know the “real” deal on it. As I shall be traveling out of state a few hours and paying for hotel to see this event. Im glad to hear you mostly enjoyed it. Did they offer up anything for dinner?
Thanks for letting me know about LR3. I’ve been considering giving it a try.
Nope, no dinner. It’s a long program, too, so I definitely recommend eating beforehand.
I attended Digital Wakeup call too. While there was some useful information, about 2/3 of the seminar was an advertisement for Ziser and his supporters. As you say “The software section was where the tour sponsors became painfully evident.”. I would advise you to save your money.
I mention this because I’m attending his “free” webinar right now. We’re 14 minutes into an hour or hour and a half webinar and it looks like it’s going to be a pitch for his new book the whole time.